by Steve Driskill | Apr 7, 2014 | [sub] corresponding structure, Means Plus Function
The algorithm definiteness inquiry for corresponding means-plus-function structure is not one of literal support but whether “a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand the algorithmic structure for performing the claimed function.” Even distinct but...
by Steve Driskill | Apr 4, 2014 | [sub] corresponding structure, Means Plus Function
The statutory requirement for importing the specification’s structural limitations into a means-plus-function element does not extend to or otherwise impact the interpretation of the recited function as claimed. “When construing functional claims under § 112 ¶ 6, the...
by Steve Driskill | Feb 24, 2014 | [sub] corresponding structure, Means Plus Function
Although a functional-type block diagram may not be sufficient to impart corresponding structure to new or unique elements claimed in means-plus-function form, “when the structure or acts that perform the function would be well within the skill of persons of ordinary...
by Steve Driskill | Feb 19, 2014 | [sub] corresponding structure, [sub] doctrine of equivalents, Claim Interpretation, Means Plus Function
“There is no … foreseeability limit on the doctrine of equivalents,” even for “the application of the doctrine of equivalents for means-plus-function limitations.” Background / Facts: The patent being asserted here is directed to an improved automobile locking...
by Steve Driskill | Dec 3, 2013 | [sub] corresponding structure, Means Plus Function
While it is true that means-plus-function elements are interpreted narrowly as covering the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, extrinsic evidence may be brought in to show that one skilled in the art would recognize that structure within the...
by Steve Driskill | Oct 22, 2013 | [sub] corresponding structure, Means Plus Function
“A description of an algorithm that places no limitations on how values are calculated, combined, or weighted is insufficient to make the bounds of the claim understandable.” Background / Facts: The patent being asserted here is directed to the monitoring of...