by Steve Driskill | Dec 2, 2015 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
The PTO’s rule requiring that any challenge to a Board decision as constituting a “new ground of rejection” must be raised in a request for rehearing to preserve it for review by the court system is not unreasonable and is in accordance with the principles of...
by Steve Driskill | Oct 1, 2015 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
Absent a recent decision of either the Board or a court, no new evidence may be submitted on appeal at the PTO that was not before the primary examiner. Here, for example, the applicant’s introduction only during the Board hearing of affidavits in support of a Rule...
by Steve Driskill | Dec 16, 2014 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
The PTO’s claim construction must be sufficiently explicit, at least as to any disputed claim term, in order to enable appellate review. Here, for example, the Board’s refusal to construe the term “threshold value” while nevertheless finding that the prior art did not...
by Steve Driskill | Aug 29, 2014 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
Simply prompting the Board during an appeal to acknowledge a given issue in responding to arguments for a fundamentally separate issue is not sufficient to preserve the first issue for further appellate proceedings. In order to make sure that the issue is preserved,...
by Steve Driskill | Jun 9, 2014 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
The Board has been encouraged here by the Federal Circuit to review the examiner’s rejections for consistency and make independent rejections based at least on the art before it where appropriate. Depending on how this plays out, it may make sense to proactively argue...
by Steve Driskill | Oct 22, 2013 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
Arguments not raised in an opening brief will generally be considered to have been waived. Background / Facts: The reexamination application on appeal here from the PTAB is directed to an “Electronic Bookstore Vending Machine” for printing and binding books on demand....