by Steve Driskill | Dec 9, 2014 | [sub] terminal disclaimer, PTO Procedure
The existence of a mistake by an attorney, other than the type falling under § 255 or a lack of actual authority from a client, is not sufficient grounds to withdraw a terminal disclaimer. Here, for example, a miscommunication about the desire to file a terminal...
by Steve Driskill | Oct 29, 2014 | [sub] obviousness-type, [sub] terminal disclaimer, Double Patenting, PTO Procedure
A terminal disclaimer that purports to attach to all child applications will be honored. Here, for example, a terminal disclaimer in a parent application stating that it attaches to “any application which is entitled to the filing date of this application under 35...
