UCB, INC. v. YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Fed. Cir. 2016) (P) – Unentered claims may prevent other claims from being interpreted to encompass the same subject matter

Claims denied entry during prosecution for including new matter may prevent other claims from being later interpreted to encompass the same subject matter. Here, for example, claims directed to a particular species of cytotoxin that were rejected during prosecution...

VOCALTAG LTD. v. AGIS AUTOMATISERING B.V. (Fed. Cir. 2016) (NP) – Algorithmic structure for a means-plus-function element need not be illustrated explicitly in the drawings

Algorithmic structure corresponding to a means-plus-function element need not be illustrated explicitly in the drawings when the associated text of the specification makes clear that the claimed function is contemplated. Here, for example, an algorithm illustrated in...

VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION (Fed. Cir. 2016) (P) – A distinguishing combination of newly added features is generally sufficient for an IPR motion to amend

A showing that the combination of newly added features in substitute claims for inter partes review distinguishes over the prior art is generally sufficient to satisfy the requirements of a motion to amend without addressing whether each newly added feature was...