by Steve Driskill | Sep 10, 2014 | [sub] analogous art, Prior Art
Different fields of invention may nevertheless provide analogous art when the particular technical problem with which the inventor is involved (as opposed to commercial problems concerning the end-product) is such that the two fields represent a relatively close-knit...
by Steve Driskill | Sep 3, 2014 | [sub] Alice step one, Subject Matter Eligibility
Claims that are squarely about creating a “contractual relationship” (e.g., a “transaction performance guaranty”) fall under the purview of abstract ideas for the purposes of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The “contractual relationship”...
by Steve Driskill | Aug 29, 2014 | [sub] appellate, PTO Procedure
Simply prompting the Board during an appeal to acknowledge a given issue in responding to arguments for a fundamentally separate issue is not sufficient to preserve the first issue for further appellate proceedings. In order to make sure that the issue is preserved,...
by Steve Driskill | Aug 26, 2014 | [sub] Alice step one, Subject Matter Eligibility
Claims related to a kind of “organizing human activity” (e.g., minimizing security risks during bingo ticket purchases) that can be “carried out in existing computers long in use” and/or “done mentally” are likely directed to an abstract idea under the first prong of...
by Steve Driskill | Aug 22, 2014 | [sub] motivation, Obviousness
In establishing obviousness under 35 U.S.C § 103, it is not sufficient to merely assert in a conclusory manner that certain limitations “would have been obvious or could have been predicted” while failing to address why one of ordinary skill in the art would have...